翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Doctrine of capacities
・ Doctrine of cash equivalence
・ Doctrine of chances
・ Doctrine of colourability
・ Doctrine of concurrent delay
・ Doctrine of Election
・ Doctrine of equivalents
・ Doctrine of Exchange
・ Doctrine of exoneration of liens
・ Doctrine of Father Divine
・ Doctrine of foreign equivalents
・ Doctrine of indivisibility
・ Doctrine of inherency
・ Doctrine of internal relations
・ Doctrine of Labyrinths
Doctrine of lapse
・ Doctrine of marshalling
・ Doctrine of necessity
・ Doctrine of non-derogation from grants
・ Doctrine of parity
・ Doctrine of repair and reconstruction
・ Doctrine of separation
・ Doctrine of signatures
・ Doctrine of the affections
・ Doctrine of the Mean
・ Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813
・ Doctrine of worthier title
・ Doctrines of civil procedure
・ Doctrines of Meister Eckhart
・ Docudesk


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Doctrine of lapse : ウィキペディア英語版
Doctrine of lapse

The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy purportedly devised by Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General for the East India Company in India between 1848 and 1856. According to the Doctrine, any princely state or territory under the direct influence (paramountcy) of the British East India Company (the dominant imperial power in the subcontinent), as a vassal state under the British Subsidiary System, would automatically be annexed if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a male heir".〔Keay, John. ''India: A History''. Grove Press Books, distributed by Publishers Group West. United States: 2000 ISBN 0-8021-3797-0, p. 433.〕 The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its application were widely regarded by many Indians as illegitimate.
==History==
At the time of its adoption, the British East India Company had imperial administrative jurisdiction over wide regions of the subcontinent. The company took over the princely states of Satara (1848), Jaitpur and Sambalpur (1849), Nagpur and Jhansi (1854), Tanjore and Arcot (1855), Udaipur (Chhattisgarh) and Oudh (1856) under the terms of the Doctrine of Lapse. Mostly claiming that the ruler was not ruling properly, the Company added about four million pounds sterling to its annual revenue by virtue of this doctrine.〔Wolpert, Stanley. ''A New History of India''; 3rd ed., pp. 226-28. Oxford University Press, 1989.〕 Udaipur State, however, would have local rule reinstated by the British in 1860.〔(Rajput Provinces of India - Udaipur (Princely State) )〕
With the increasing power of the East India Company, discontent simmered among many sections of Indian society and the largely indigenous armed forces; these rallied behind the deposed dynasties during the Indian rebellion of 1857 also known as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857. Following the rebellion, in 1858, the new British Viceroy of India, whose rule replaced that of the British East India Company, renounced the doctrine.〔Wolpert (1989), p. 240.〕
The princely state of Kittur was taken over by the East India Company in 1824 by imposing a 'Doctrine Of Lapse'. So it is debatable whether it was actually devised by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, though he arguably did make it official by documenting it. Dalhousie's annexations and the doctrine of lapse had caused suspicion and uneasiness among most ruling princes in India.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Doctrine of lapse」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.